<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NC10 Wireless N</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robyholmes.com/2009/09/09/nc10-wireless-n/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robyholmes.com/2009/09/09/nc10-wireless-n/</link>
	<description>robyholmes blogs for you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:51:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.robyholmes.com/2009/09/09/nc10-wireless-n/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robyholmes.com/?p=245#comment-306</guid>
		<description>If i remember right you want 1 and 3 furthest away, from each other and 2 in the middle. Looking at my pictures I have put original antenna&#039;s on 1 and 3 and my new one on 2, but I have a feeling they didn&#039;t go in order 1,2,3 on the card, so it might be 1,3,2 meaning 3 is the new one. If you have the same card just check. I hope that helps, bit since I did it tho. I have done another since and used a bit different card so it might have been that one which was out of order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i remember right you want 1 and 3 furthest away, from each other and 2 in the middle. Looking at my pictures I have put original antenna&#8217;s on 1 and 3 and my new one on 2, but I have a feeling they didn&#8217;t go in order 1,2,3 on the card, so it might be 1,3,2 meaning 3 is the new one. If you have the same card just check. I hope that helps, bit since I did it tho. I have done another since and used a bit different card so it might have been that one which was out of order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.robyholmes.com/2009/09/09/nc10-wireless-n/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robyholmes.com/?p=245#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Is there any special way or sequence the antenna wires hook up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any special way or sequence the antenna wires hook up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.robyholmes.com/2009/09/09/nc10-wireless-n/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robyholmes.com/?p=245#comment-140</guid>
		<description>You know the answer to that. Gman on GVL did the same to his laptop and got a lot better results so I am just going to try some more things. Its getting it to use wirelesss N that&#039;s the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know the answer to that. Gman on GVL did the same to his laptop and got a lot better results so I am just going to try some more things. Its getting it to use wirelesss N that&#8217;s the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subseeter</title>
		<link>http://www.robyholmes.com/2009/09/09/nc10-wireless-n/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Subseeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robyholmes.com/?p=245#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Nice Laptop. how much faster is it with the new wireless N card? and how much further can it go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Laptop. how much faster is it with the new wireless N card? and how much further can it go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

